Thursday, January 28, 2010

No More Kitty-Kung-Pao

Cat and dog meat could soon be off the menu in China as first animal abuse law edges closer

Dog and cat meat could soon be banned from restaurants in China, ending thousands of years of tradition, following protests from animal rights campaigners.
The Chinese government is now on the verge of introducing its first law against animal abuse and permanently removing both animals from the menu.
The first draft of the law, aiming to protect animals from being hurt and killed in a cruel manner, will be raised for legislation in April.
  dog meat
Dogs look out of their cages from a truck on a motorway on the outskirts of China's capital Beijing
In particular, the draft suggests people caught eating dog or cat meat be jailed for up to 15 days and fined 5,000 yuan (£450), while businesses would be fined between 100,000 to 500,000 yuan (£9,000 to £45,000).
Pet lovers' associations have sprung up in Chinese cities over recent years, with one liberation group last year ramming a truck full of caged cats to rescue them from being shipped to southern restaurants.
While many Chinese enjoy rich dog meat, especially during cold winters, some object to the practice in some regions of beating dogs to death to release the blood into the meat.


The China National Native Produce & Animal By-Products Import and Export Corporation backed the initiative, which it believes will improve overseas perceptions of Chinese exports.
Others insisted a ban on dog and cat meat was unrealistic.
'Banning such custom by law is inappropriate and unable to work,' said Xu Huiqiang, chief of wild animal protection in Jiangsu province, where a dog meat recipe has been listed as a piece of cultural heritage.
An official of Leping, a city that has a traditional catering industry based on dog meat, said that the local economy and people's lives would be terribly hurt by such a law.
'Cooking them alive must be punished but which meat to eat should be people's own choice,' said a commentary on Xinhua Daily in Nanjing. 'Some people in China still can't afford meat. We should not blindly copy Western values.'
But one online protester named 'Yuxiang999' posted on Xinhuanet.com: 'Eating cats and dogs is a shameless barbarian thing. Anyone with humanity would not kill these loyal friends of ours.'

Buddy's Law - The Petition

Currently, we are circulating a petition to both the Colorado General Assembly and our state senators to enact what is being called Buddy's Law. This will make much stricter punishment for any animal abuser. Currently, in most cases, the abuser simply gets a fine and probation and 9 times out of 10, if the animal lives he or she is given back to the abuser.

The petition can be signed by clicking this link:

Please Sign Buddy's Law



















Please help us to make sure that no other animal will have to endure this kind of torture at the hands of another monster like this ever again!!

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

10 German Sheperds Killed by RSPCA in England

Dozens of people have cancelled their donations to the RSPCA after learning that the UK animal welfare charity killed 10 healthy German shepherd dogs following the death of their guardian. The dogs, who had been kept indoors for several weeks, were said to be aggressive and in poor condition and killed using a captive bolt gun, but various animal shelters condemned the RSPCA for failing to find homes for the dogs. The RSPCA admits that it did not attempt to contact animal shelters for help in finding homes for the dogs.
Jayne Shenstone, founder of German Shepherd Rescue, which rehouses between 200 and 300 alsatians every year, said: “The RSPCA never approached us or any other dog rescue centre. There was no reason for the dogs to be destroyed."
Dozens of people have said they are cancelling standing orders or reconsidering legacies, which earn the RSPCA tens of millions of pounds a year.
An RSPCA spokesman said: “It was an absolutely extreme case. I have never heard of [the captive bolt gun] being used before but apparently eight inspectors, including some very senior and experienced, decided it was the best course of action.”

Groundhog Day offends PETA?

 

PETA proposes robotic groundhog for Pa. festival


 


An animal rights group wants organizers of Pennsylvania's Groundhog Day festival to replace Punxsutawney Phil with a robotic stand-in.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals says it's unfair to keep the animal in captivity and subject him to the huge crowds and bright lights that accompany tens of thousands of revelers each Feb. 2 in Punxsutawney, a tiny borough about 65 miles northeast of Pittsburgh.

PETA is suggesting the use of an animatronic model.

But William Deeley, president of the Inner Circle of the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club, says the animal is "being treated better than the average child in Pennsylvania." The groundhog is kept in a climate-controlled environment and is inspected annually by the state Department of Agriculture.

Deeley says PETA isn't interested in Phil from Feb. 2 on, and is looking for publicity.

Signs of something wrong....


Dead Animal Jewelry?


Reid Peppard is probably the only person who feels a rush of excitement when she sees a dead animal lying
on the side of the road. To her, it isn't a rotting carcass, but a thing of beauty just waiting to have life breathed
into it. Peppard's London-based fashion line, RP/Encore, uses taxidermy to turn dead creatures, namely
rodents and vermin, into wearable accessories. Many have serious issues with just how "wearable" her
pieces are, however, which range from full-on rat headpieces to pigeon feather necklaces.
Peppard was studying fine arts at Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design in London when she
became interested in taxidermy. For her, it seemed a natural marriage to combine her skills as an artist
and taxidermist, and she sees her work as walking the line between fashion and fine art.
To be clear, you can take comfort in the fact that no animals are suffering for fashion here. Peppard,
who is a vegetarian, uses animals that are "victims of roadkill, pest control, or natural death," with the
occasional use of a feeder rat.
But is there really anything comfortable about this?
"If you don't like it, then just look away," Peppard offers to those who are offended by her
"Vermin Collection." "So many people are unwilling to look inwards. They are unable to see beyond
what they want to see."
It's hard to look away though, even if it does offend you. We're talking about dead rodents, with faces
and limbs, hanging from your wrist, crowning your head, holding your coins, etc. Looking at these pieces
upsets some and intrigues others. Whatever the reaction, it's anything but lukewarm.
At a cost of 100 to 2,000 pounds a piece, you can have one of your very own
"conversation starters." Lady Gaga even wore one in a music video.
Take a look and let us know what you think about these dead animal accessories.

Finally, there is justice for Karley

Glynn Johnson, former L.A. County fire official, found guilty of animal cruelty in beating of neighbor's dog

January 26, 2010 |  8:35 pm
Protest
Former Los Angeles County assistant fire chief Glynn Johnson, 55, was found guilty of felony animal cruelty and using a deadly weapon in Riverside County Superior Court today in the 2008 beating of his neighbor's puppy.

The animal, a 6-month-old German shepherd mix named Karley, sustained injuries so severe that she had to be euthanized after the beating. Johnson hit her repeatedly with a 12-pound rock in what he described as an act of self-defense; according to his version of events, Karley viciously attacked him before the beating occurred. The defense's strategy:
During his opening statements last Tuesday, Deputy District Attorney Will Robinson said [Johnson] put dog feces in his neighbors' mailbox with a letter warning them to keep their dogs off his property.
The Tooles are the "neighbors from hell" who routinely take in stray animals and then don't take care of them, giving them the run of the community, defense attorneys argued. And the Tooles tried to domesticate a stray named Karley, unsuccessfully, the defense added.
Prosecutors disputed that account, saying that Johnson's attack on the dog was unprovoked.  A sentencing is scheduled for March 8; Johnson could face up to four years in prison.

The Punisher does exist!!!

DENVER, COLORADO
January 27, 2010


Much like Stan Lee's comic book character "The Punisher" it seems that an individual in Colorado has taken the law into his own hands.

On the morning of January 26, A man who had previously been charged with abusing his two German Shepherd dogs was found naked and chained to a tree in his back yard. His hands and feet had been bound with zip ties and he had been gagged with a hand towel.

This came not long after the man (who has asked news outlets to remain anonymous) was charged with animal neglect had tied his dogs up to the same tree outside for nearly 72 hours straight in 20 degree temperatures. A passerby had noticed the dogs and made the phone call.

Suffering from hypothermia and dehydration, the man claims that he was walking into his home when he was struck on the back of the head by a heavy object. He did not see the attacker. Police later discovered a white skull with elongated teeth spray painted onto the hood of his car with the words: "How do you like it?"

Currently, there is no reward offered for any information in this case.

Today, at least some justice will be served.....

On December 30th a male German shepherd/blue heel mix dog was found dead with a rope around it’s neck and dumped on the Colorado National Monument. It was a crime that shocked the community. The dog, Buddy, had evidently been tied to a vehicle and forced to run then when he could no longer keep up, he was dragged for three miles, suffering, tortured and strangled then tossed like garbage. Tracks in the snowed show the cruel story.
“We’ve not seen this type of heinous crime in the monument before and I certainly hope we don’t see it again,” said Colorado National Monument superintendent Joan Anzelmo. “The animal apparently was attached to the vehicle at the base of the west hill, and as the vehicle accelerated, first it was walking then it was running. It couldn’t keep up and was being drug and strangled as it got to the three mile mark on the west hill,” she said.
Steven Clay RomeroVideo surveillance showed a double-cab pickup truck entering the monument at 2:18 a.m. Wednesday, 12/30, with a dog in the bed of the truck and another camera capture the same truck leaving at 2:30am without the dog.
Between studying the surveillance tapes and tips, National Park Rangers were led to Steven Clay Romero, 37 of Grand Junction. Outside Romero’s residence they found paw prints in the front yard and a search of the garage turned up rope matching that which was found around Buddy’s neck.
“Romero’s sister stated that the dog was in their home and Romero said he was going to kill it,” the affidavit said. “She stated he left with the dog late last night and returned home a half hour later without it.”
A neighbor also said that they saw Romero leave the house with a dog that fit Buddy’s description and return home without it.
Romero, who has been arrested six times in the past seven years by police in Montrose and Grand Junction on a variety of charges, including weapons offenses, traffic violations and drug distribution, was arrested as he emerged from a courtroom in the Grand Junction Courthouse on 12/31 from a hearing on a drug and weapon-related case stemming from a Sept. 12 arrest at a local motel. Romero was charged with one count of aggravated cruelty towards animals which carries a maximum penalty of three years in federal prison and a fine of $100,000, and one year of mandatory parole.
Denied bail, Romero said, “I don’t get it,” at which point Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle Heldmyer tossed a copy of the charges on the table in front of him.

Romero whined about being an over-the-road trucker who had a family to support. To date, he has yet to show any remorse, concern or care about what has happened, and still continues to deny any involvement.

“So, in other words I’ll be sitting in jail and probably lose my job, too?” Romero asked.

“Yes,” the judge responded.

And as horrific as this crime is, what makes it even worse, if that’s possible, is that this dog did not belong to Romero, Buddy was stolen from an acquaintance's home!

This waste of human life callously tortured an innocent animal for no reason and just doesn’t get why his ass is sitting in jail. Here’s to hoping he learns that lesson the hard way!

Letter to Dogs and Cats

Dear Cats and Dogs:

When I say to move, it means go someplace else, not switch positions with each other so there are still two of you in the way.

The dishes with the paw print are yours and contain your food. The other dishes are mine and contain my food. Please note, placing a paw print in the middle of my plate of food does not stake a claim for it becoming your food and dish, nor do I find that aesthetically pleasing in the slightest.

The stairway was not designed by NASCAR and is not a racetrack. Beating me to the bottom is not the object. Tripping me doesn't help, because I fall faster than you can run.

I cannot buy anything bigger than a king size bed. I am very sorry about this. Do not think I will continue to sleep on the couch to ensure your comfort.  Look at videos of dogs and cats sleeping, they can actually curl up in a ball. It is not necessary to sleep perpendicular to each other stretched out to the fullest extent possible. I also know that sticking tails straight out and having tongues hanging out the other end to maximize space used is nothing but sarcasm.

Compact discs are not miniature Frisbees.

For the last time, there is not a secret exit from the bathroom. If by some miracle I beat you there and manage to get the door shut, it is not necessary to claw, whine, and try to turn the knob, or get your paw under the edge and try to pull the door open. I must exit through the same door I entered. In addition, I have been using bathrooms for years. Feline or canine attendance is not mandatory.

The proper order is kiss me, then go smell the other cat or dogs' butt. I cannot stress this enough. It would be such a simple change for you.

To pacify you I have posted the following message on our front door...

Rules for Non-Pet Owners Who Visit and Like to Complain About Our Pets:
1. They live here. You don't.

2. If you don't want their hair on your clothes, stay off the furniture.

3. I like my pet a lot better than I like most people.

4. To you, it's an animal. To me, he/she is an adopted son/daughter who is short, hairy, walks on all fours and doesn't speak clearly.

5. Dogs and cats are better than kids. They eat less, don't ask for money all the time, are easier to train, usually come when called, never drive your car, don't hang out with drug-using friends, don't smoke or drink, don't worry about buying the latest fashions, don't wear your clothes, don't need a gazillion dollars for college, and don't come over only on the weekends to do their laundry.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Steven Clay Romero Arraignment

Well all,

The day is coming! Steven Clay Romero will be arraigned by a Colorado Federal Court tomorrow at 4 p.m. in Grand Junction, CO.

I would love to attend, but will be unable to do so as that Grand Junction is about a 5 hour drive from our home and our son will be getting out of school right as it is starting.

Oh well... I'll still get the satisfaction of watching him squirm on television.

Anyone who does live nearby should attend the rally:

MESA COUNTY COURTHOUSE
544 Rood Avenue
Grand Junction, CO 81501-2642
(970) 244-1662

Thanks again!

Buddy's Law Has Been Written!!!!

Colorado Law as it currently stands:

Colorado Statutes, Title 18, Article 9, Part 2
Colorado Revised Statute 18-9-202

Animal cruelty is defined as: “Knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence overdrives, overloads, overworks, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, unnecessarily or cruelly beats, allows to be housed in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm, carries or confines in or upon any vehicles in a cruel or reckless manner, or otherwise mistreats or neglects any animal, or causes or procures it to be done, or, having the charge or custody of any animal, fails to provide it with proper food, drink, or protection from the weather, consistent with the species, breed, and type of animal involved, or abandons an animal” or “recklessly or with criminal negligence tortures, needlessly mutilates, or needlessly kills an animal.” Conviction of Cruelty to Animals is a Class 1 Misdemeanor with a minimum fine of $400, maximum fine of $5000. In addition to any other fine, a surcharge of up to $400 shall be paid to the county where the violation occurred to be put into the Animal Cruelty Prevention fund. A subsequent conviction of Cruelty to Animals carries of minimum fine of $1000, maximum fine of $5000 and a minimum of 90 days imprisonment or home detention, maximum imprisonment of 18 months. Anger Management or other psychological treatment as defined by the court is required, cost of care may also be assessed.

Aggravated Cruelty is: “knowingly tortures, needlessly mutilates, or needlessly kills an animal.” A conviction of Aggravated Animal Cruelty is a Class 6 Felony with a maximum fine of up to $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 18 months, minimum of 90 days in prison or in-home detention. Subsequent conviction of Aggravated Animal Cruelty is a Class 5 Felony with a maximum fine of $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 3 years. Exemptions are made for farming, draft or pack animals, rodeos, veterinary care, research, hunting and trapping.

Colorado Law with it's revisions into Buddy's Law:

Colorado Statutes, Title 18, Article 9, Part 2
Colorado Revised Statute 18-9-202

Neglect of an Animal is defined as: “Knowingly overdrives, overloads, overworks, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, unnecessarily or cruelly beats, allows to be housed in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm, carries or confines in or upon any vehicles in a cruel or reckless manner, or otherwise mistreats or neglects any animal, or causes or procures it to be done, or, having the charge or custody of any animal, fails to provide it with proper food, drink, or protection from the weather, consistent with the species, breed, and type of animal involved, or abandons an animal” or “recklessly or with criminal negligence tortures, needlessly mutilates, or needlessly kills an animal.”

Conviction of Neglect of an Animal shall be charged as follows: Class 1 misdemeanor with a minimum fine of $1,000 and a maximum fine of $5,000. Further, those convicted with Neglect of an Animal shall not be allowed to possess, own, care for or otherwise have access to companion animals in the State of Colorado. A second conviction of Neglect of an Animal shall be charged as follows: Class 1 misdemeanor with a minimum fine of $5,000 and a maximum fine of $10,000. Second convictions may also face a prison sentence of 12 months minimum and 24 months maximum.

Animal cruelty is defined as: “Knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence overdrives, overloads, overworks, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, unnecessarily or cruelly beats, allows to be housed in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm, carries or confines in or upon any vehicles in a cruel or reckless manner, or otherwise mistreats or neglects any animal, or causes or procures it to be done, or, having the charge or custody of any animal, fails to provide it with proper food, drink, or protection from the weather, consistent with the species, breed, and type of animal involved, or abandons an animal” or “recklessly or with criminal negligence tortures, needlessly mutilates, or needlessly kills an animal.”

Conviction of Cruelty to Animals is a Class 5 Felony charge with a minimum fine of $50,000, maximum fine of $500,000. In addition to any other fine, a surcharge of up to $4,000 shall be paid to the county where the violation occurred to be put into the Animal Cruelty Prevention fund. A subsequent conviction of Cruelty to Animals is hereby charged as follows:




Class 2 Felony

Minimum - 8 years prison, $5,000 fine. Maximum - 24 years prison, $1,000,000 fine.

In addition to the above stated, also imposed shall be mandatory psychological counseling, 5,000 hours of useful community service, not in a veterinary clinic, animal shelter or other place where animals are present, and all related costs of care may also be assessed. The second conviction may also be defined as Aggravated Cruelty.

Aggravated Cruelty is: “knowingly tortures, needlessly mutilates, or needlessly kills an animal.” Exemptions are made for hunting and trapping, however the procedure must be completed in a timely and humane manner with no undue suffering.

In rare cases, an individual may commit a crime of a heinous or otherwise inhuman act against a companion that does not fall into the above categories. As with the case of the People of the State of Colorado V. Steven Clay Romero, a jury or judge may elect to impose harsher punishments than those stated above provided that the defendant: "has shown total lack of compassion toward living beings either animal or human, has more than 2 convictions for any of the above charges, or poses a real and immediate threat to the community in which he or she lives." In these cases, a minimum sentence of 10 years prison and a maximum sentence of 25 years prison may be charged. Any person receiving such sentence must submit for mandatory psychological evaluation and perform 5,000 hours of useful community service, not in a veterinary clinic, animal shelter or other place where animals are present.

Buddy's Law

Dear Friends,

So, like anyone else out there, you're probably wondering what's up with Buddy and the petition about him plastered all over Facebook.

On December 30 of 2009, a man named Steven Clay Romero and his sister stole a German Shepherd dog named Buddy out of the back of his family's truck while they were stopped at a grocery store. From there, Buddy was driven into the Colorado mountains and taken to a very rough and icy road. Romero, being the sick individual he is, tied Buddy to the back of his truck and then proceeded to drag him nearly 3 miles to his death.

Tomorrow, a Colorado court is going to arraign Romero for this crime, but the punishment leaves A LOT to be desired. In this state, only a SECOND offense of violent animal cruelty warrants a felony charge. Since this is Romero's first offense, he is only going to receive a maximum of 3 years in prison and a fine of $100,000

Sounds like he got off easy for torture and murder...

Buddy's Law is a petition that has been circling the net on Care2.Com who have graciously hosted it. My husband created the online petition which is seeking 1,000,000 signatures to make it a felony charge in Colorado for even a first offense. We hope, that if enough signatures are added, to take it to the Federal level and see if we can even make it a national law!

We do need help though, and anyone out there with even half a soul should be willing to take the 2 minutes necessary to pause whatever else is on their computer screen, open a new web window, and sign it.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/buddys-law---help-enact-it

This case, and our petition has been recieving a fair amount of attention in Colorado, but unfortunately we do not have the standing that we need yet to be taken seriously.

Please help us and make sure that Buddy did not die in vain. Everyday, people commit more heinous and more evil acts against others, animals, children and continue time and time again to dodge the punishment that they deserve. We need to send a clear message to all those that would murder, kill and maim an innocent of any variety that we simply will not tolerate their existence in our society.

We invite you to sign the petition, show your love for life and follow this blog as that we will be posting articles covering this story and our progress.

From the deepest part of our hearts,

Thank you.